Full Professor at the Department of Information and Communications Technologies Department (DTIC) at UPF, the head of the Interactive and Distributed Technologies for Education group (TIDE), Vice-Dean of the UPF Engineering School and the Head of its Unit for Teaching Quality and Innovation.
Postdoctoral researcher at Interactive and Distributed Technologies for Education group (TIDE), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona (Spain) @LaiaAlbo
Lecturer in Education & Technology and Head of the Learning Technologies Unit at the UCL Institute of Education, based at the UCL Knowledge Lab. My work includes the promotion and support of ICT use in higher education.
Chair of Learning with Digital Technologies
UCL Knowledge Lab,
UCL Institute of Education
ucl.ac.uk, ucl.ac.uk/ioe/departments-and-centres/centres/ucl-knowledge-lab
Founding Director of the Centre for Information Technology in Education (CITE), Faculty of Education, HKU
Corresponding co-convener, Sciences of Learning Strategic Research Theme, Humanities and Social Sciences Prestigious Fellowship (2015) Recipient
בשנים האחרונות אנו עדים להכרה גוברת בערך של עיצוב למידה, הן כגישה מקצועית לעבודה חינוכית והן כתחום מחקר ופיתוח. באירופה, באסיה, בארה”ב ובאוסטרליה עולה המודעות לתפיסות של עיצוב למידה, ויותר ויותר מסודות משלבות כלים ותהליכים של עיצוב למידה במחזור פיתוח התכניות והקורסים שלהם.
סדנה זו תציג בפני המשתתפים את חזית העשיה בהמשגות, גישות ושיטות העבודה בתחום – דרך נקודת המבט של ארבע צוותים מובילים. כל צוות יציג כלי שפיתח ויספר על התובנות שעלו מהפיתוח, ההתמעה והשימוש בו. למשתתפים תינתן הזדמנות לנסות את הכלים ולהעריך את תרומתם האפשרית למוסד בו הם עובדים.
Learning Design, as a professional discipline and a field of research, is gaining recognition. We are witnessing a growing awareness in Europe, the US, Australia and Asia. In particular, several interesting learning design tools have been developed in recent years.
This event will introduce participants to state of the art concepts, approaches and methodologies through the perspectives of four teams. Each team will showcase their tool, and share insights they have gained from developing this tool and using it with educational practitioners. Participants will have an opportunity to try these tools, and consider their value for staff at their institutions.
תודה רבה לכל המציגים והמשתתפים. יצרנו קבוצת וואטסאפ להמשך הדיון:
https://meitalconfold.iucc.ac.il/workshops2020
A big thank you to all the presenters and participants. We have created a whatsapp group to continue the conversation:
Nancy Law, HKU: the Learning Design Studio HE – A tool to support teaching professionals in the design and implementation of fully online and blended courses Presentation.
https://ldshe.cite.hku.hk/ user guide: https://ldshe.cite.hku.hk/users/about/guide.php
Shirley Agostinho, UoW and Lori Lockyer, UTS: the LDTool and the Problem Generation tool – supporting teachers as designers. Presentation
https://needle.uow.edu.au/ldt,
https://learningdesignresearch.wordpress.com/
Diana Laurillard and Tim Neumann, UCL: The Learning Designer helps create, adapt, share and export learning designs. http://learningdesigner.org/ user guide: LDer Guide 2020
Davinia Hernández-Leo and Laia Albó, UPF: The Integrated Learning Design Environment and edCrumble – tools, toolkits and methodologies. https://ilde.upf.edu/about/,
https://ilde2.upf.edu/edcrumble/ user guide: https://ilde2.upf.edu/edcrumble/help/
The Learning Design Studio gives a very complete overview of the whole curriculum and pedagogy design process. This inevitably makes it quite complicated. I think I counted 9 different diagrammatic representations of different aspects of the process. Are teachers able to cope with all these different ways of looking at the process, or do you use only some parts at different stages with them?
Could ILDE/EdCrumble also show us how a learning design is represented by a teacher, and how teachers are supported in creating their design?
For the Learning Design Studio I can see that the teacher designer can specify the intended duration of each learning task, so that it can provide feedback on the balance of learning activities. But I can’t see if ILDE and LD Tool do something like that – could you please clarify?
This is a question for Diana and the Learning Designer team. The Learning Designer was preceded by the Pedagogical Pattern Collector. I like the idea of the pedagogical pattern very much, and still think that it provides a very elegant way of representing patterns at the task level. Is the idea of pedagogical patterns still reside somewhere in the Learning Designer?